Google has launched Knol, its user-generated online encyclopedia, which it announced in December but had kept under wraps in private testing.
Although its goal and approach are similar to Wikipedia's -- to tap the collective knowledge of Internet users within an encyclopedia format -- Knol is different in several ways.
Knol will encourage writers to use their real names and stand behind their articles, and will give them the possibility to generate income from their work via Google ads.
"Every knol will have an author, or group of authors, who put their name behind their content. It's their knol, their voice, their opinion. We expect that there will be multiple knols on the same subject, and we think that is good," wrote Knol product manager Cedric Dupont and software engineer Michael McNally in an official blog posting Wednesday.
Wikipedia, on the other hand, has a culture of anonymity in which contributors rarely use their real names, and no ads appear on the site.
In addition, Knol apparently will have more controls over submissions and edits than Wikipedia. In Knol, readers can suggest changes to articles, and the authors have the final word on whether to accept or reject the feedback. "This allows authors to accept suggestions from everyone in the world while remaining in control of their content. After all, their name is associated with it," the Google officials wrote. Readers will also be able to rate articles and write reviews of them.
In Wikipedia, anyone can make changes to articles and have them appear instantly online.
Although in the blog posting knols are described as "authoritative articles about specific topics, written by people who know about those subjects," a Google spokesman said that anyone can write an article.
"Google will have no advance knowledge of the content of a knol and we will not be doing editorial screening of content posted by users and authors," he wrote via e-mail.
In addition, Google will encourage authors to use their real names, but will not require it, he said. Google will give authors the ability to have their identity confirmed via a telephone or credit card verification process. Articles penned by these authors will appear with a "verified" stamp, he said.
Another difference is that in Wikipedia all content is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. This means that Wikipedia content can be copied, modified, and redistributed, as long as the new version extends those same freedoms to others and acknowledges the authors of the Wikipedia article used.
In Knol, authors will get two options for licensing their work. They may choose to reserve some rights using a Creative Commons license. They also may opt for a traditional copyright license format to reserve all rights.
References
Latest on Collaboration
- SharePoint search bolstered with MetaVis tools
- Sharepoint gets Notes 8.5 integration from Mainsoft
- Aussie devs make Wave with Google Web Toolkit
- Google's Wave consolidates core online features in one tool
- Monash eyes video conferencing for collaboration boost
- Ozzie: E-mail, collaboration will drive move to cloud
- Personal accounts, smart forms coming to Australia.gov.au
- Allianz removes walls of paper with open source ECM
- NewsGator's enterprise collaboration SW adds brainstorming
- Jive intros simpler SaaS version of collaboration suite
Software Essentials
- Ballmer: Yahoo acquisition won't happen
- Sun is a software company, new top shareholder says
- Forecast has Office, Vista going in opposite directions
- Interview with The Pirate Bay founder
- The future of software testing
- Bill Gates predicts software revolution
- 'Warez' software pirate sentenced to probation
- Mobile app development moves beyond CRM, but slowly
- Tibco backing Microsoft Silverlight
- Most top banks already using virtualization
TechWorld Jobs (beta)
Recent Jobs
TechWorld Blogs
-

TalkingTech
The view from the top of IT with TechWorld Editor Rodney Gedda
-

Entrenched
Cooking up better code, IDG's developers reveal some of their secrets
-

Broadband Voice
Darren Pauli digs in from the front line of Australia's broadband battleground
Recent blog posts
- Nokia remains 'open' to Android amid Symbian renaissance
- KDE's Seigo gives sneak peek at version 4.3
- Was the iPhone 3G S worth queuing up for?
- Has Oracle started its mammoth technology consolidation?
- iPhone 3.0: the detail is the process, not the features
- TechWorld.com.au goes mobile
- Should Dell buy Palm? Stranger things have happened
- A big week for Linux: is user friendliness finally in sight?
- Apple, Android rain on Palm's Pre parade
- The clone attack is becoming unstoppable
Recent comments
- State your Prediction and
4 hours 52 min ago - Yes I have seen them.Actually
5 hours 45 min ago - PSP Nintendo
20 hours 53 min ago - Interesting report. You were
1 day 17 hours ago - Are you sure it is in Sydney?
2 days 4 hours ago - The mobile market has
2 days 12 hours ago - Great news.
Sms spam should
3 days 8 hours ago - now what am I gonna do with
3 days 11 hours ago - ozlotteries.com not ozlotto.cm
3 days 13 hours ago - OLAT Release
3 days 23 hours ago - and i was sure i would win...
4 days 3 hours ago - Hi SolidRadicle,
I am looking
4 days 4 hours ago - Not if I can help it
4 days 4 hours ago - Ozlotto Tips Scam
4 days 8 hours ago - Great post.
It's very
4 days 8 hours ago - Excellent review! I'm glad
6 days 6 hours ago - iTunes Helper
1 week 1 day ago - Update the link to OrangeHRM web site
1 week 2 days ago - Very informative article
1 week 2 days ago - Google Chrome is still being directed to bing instead of google
1 week 2 days ago










Comments
Post new comment