NetApp customers can now de-duplicate primary storage from other vendors such as EMC, Hitachi and HP, NetApp is announcing Wednesday.
NetApp for the past year has been trumpeting its ability to de-duplicate primary storage, as opposed to backup storage, the more common target. But previously NetApp only de-duplicated primary storage on its own hardware. With Wednesday's announcement, NetApp is adding this ability to its V-Series line of storage virtualization products, which work with systems from third-party vendors.
"None of these guys have de-duplication for primary storage," says Chris Cummings, senior director of data protection solutions at NetApp. "If you want de-duplication for EMC primary disk, NetApp's the only game in town."
EMC's de-duplication strategy centers around its Avamar backup and recovery product line.
De-duplication, which eliminates redundant or duplicate data, is taking on increased importance as enterprises deal with vastly increasing amounts of digital information. The ability to reduce data storage needs can help keep power and cooling costs under control, Cummings notes.
"Certain data center operators are now being given a kilowatt budget," he says. "If that's the case, the efficiency of storage is going to come under greater scrutiny."
NetApp began adding de-duplication to enterprise products such as the FAS6000 series last year, and the capability is now in all NetApp systems except some technology targeted at small and midsized businesses, Cummings says.
De-duplication of primary storage is proving particularly attractive to customers running virtualized servers, he says. "We can de-duplicate storage that is sitting underneath a virtualized server implementation. For NetApp, we've seen an average of 70 to 90 percent de-duplication in virtual servers," he says. If you're running up to 16 virtual machines on a single physical box, as many customers do, "that's a huge amount of space savings," he adds.
NetApp's de-duplication is part of its Data ONTAP operating system, which comes with NetApp storage at no extra cost. NetApp storage ranges broadly in price. While a NetApp FAS2000 box starts at about US$15,000, Cummings says, a large enterprise deploying lots of high-end storage might spend more than a million dollars.
Latest on Services
- Sun rolls out its own storage appliances
- Q&A: Praveen Asthana, Dell's director of enterprise storage
- eBay may offer BI-as-a-service to companies
- CommVault launches ROMS suite in ANZ
- Amazon to offer volume discounts for S3
- QuickStudy: Storage virtualization
- Managing the complexities of storage virtualization
- What to ask before launching a storage virtualization project
- Storage virtualization: The skills you need
- Affordable SSDs in the offing?
Storage Essentials
- Storage market thrives in down economy
- CSIRO looks to the petabyte age with massive storage project
- Solid state not yet on solid ground
- Q&A: Praveen Asthana, Dell's director of enterprise storage
- Storage management a black hole
- Flash storage gets enterprise attention as prices decline
- IBM's XIV storage lacks high-end features, analyst says
- Removing hard drive data -- the YouTube way
- Smart array may signal storage shift
- Vendors form 10Gbit/sec Ethernet Storage Alliance
TechWorld Jobs (beta)
Whitepapers
- Solve Exchange Storage Problems Once and For All: A New Approach without Stubs or Links
- Understanding Email Marketing: A Guide for SMBs
- Discover the advantages of an open architecture multi-vendor network solution
- Realizing the Value of Unified Communications
- Choices in Storage Architecture for Oracle Environments
TechWorld Blogs
-

TalkingTech
The view from the top of IT with TechWorld Editor Rodney Gedda
-

Entrenched
Cooking up better code, IDG's developers reveal some of their secrets
-

Broadband Voice
Darren Pauli digs in from the front line of Australia's broadband battleground
Recent blog posts
- Telstra kicked out of NBN process
- Linux on the iPhone won’t change the world - yet
- A Novell approach to business
- An open storage stack? I like the sound of that
- The mobile clone wars: fighting for a better phone experience
- Stopping the "Clean Feed"
- Identifying web platforms
- Clean Feed ‘not technically possible’
- No Clean Feed - well duh!
- Conroy's content cops still on the cards
Recent comments
- video converter os x
5 hours 23 min ago - video converter os x
5 hours 27 min ago - video converter os x
5 hours 35 min ago - video converter os x
5 hours 36 min ago - video converter os x
5 hours 36 min ago - video converter os x
5 hours 37 min ago - video converter os x
5 hours 42 min ago - video converter os x
5 hours 44 min ago - video converter os x
5 hours 45 min ago - video converter os x
5 hours 47 min ago - video converter os x
5 hours 48 min ago - video converter os x
5 hours 50 min ago - video converter os x
5 hours 52 min ago - video converter os x
5 hours 53 min ago - video converter os x
5 hours 56 min ago - video converter os x
5 hours 57 min ago - video converter os x
5 hours 59 min ago - video converter os x
5 hours 59 min ago - video converter os x
6 hours 34 sec ago - video converter os x
6 hours 1 min ago







