Neosploit, the notorious hacker exploit kit that some thought had been retired months ago, has not only returned from the dead, but is responsible for a dramatic increase in attacks, a security researcher claimed Thursday.
"Neosploit's back," said Ian Amit, director of security research at Aladdin Knowledge Systems.
The accounts of its demise last summer had been a ruse, he argued. "When you're feeling that kind of heat," Amit said, referring to the attention Neosploit had received from both researchers and authorities, "you want to shake those guys off your back. [The talk about quitting] only helped them go under the radar."
In July researchers at RSA's FraudAction Research Labs said that they had evidence that the creators of Neosploit were abandoning the business. For proof, RSA quoted a going-out-of-business message said to have originated with Neosploit's authors.
Neosploit, which first appeared in 2007, was a follow-on to the earlier MPack, and a contemporary to another infamous exploit kit, WebAttacker. Those kits, Neosploit included, were used by cybercriminals to launch attack code aimed at new vulnerabilities in Windows, Internet Explorer or third-party software such as Apple's QuickTime. But Neosploit also boasted features new to the click-to-attack business, including sophisticated statistical analysis and management tools.
However, even RSA didn't expect the Neosploit group to disband. "This isn't necessarily the end of this group," said Sean Brady, an RSA product marketing manager, in July.
Turns out he was right.
A month ago, researchers at Aladdin started to suspect that the Neosploit developers were back in business. Two days ago, they uncovered hard evidence: A server hosted in Argentina, run by a longtime Neosploit customer, that contained Neosploit 3.1. The build was dated Aug. 9, weeks after Neosploit's makers supposedly threw in the towel.
According to Amit, other data on the server showed that it was catering to 20 users, seven of whom he characterized as "very high volume," who were logging thousands of successful exploits each day from their use of Neosploit.
Those 20 criminals, added Amit, had compromised between 200 and 300 Web sites, which in turn were being used to serve up exploits from Neosploit to any visitor running a system that had not been fully patched. He found evidence of more than a quarter-million successful attacks against PCs carried out by those sites.
"Neosploit's sole purpose is to deliver malicious code to browsers," Amit said, noting that site hacking isn't part of the kit's jobs. Instead, criminals compromise sites through other vulnerabilities or by gaming the site's administrative password. Only then do they modify the hacked site with attack code from Neosploit.
Latest on Passwords
- Access vendor GridSure uses patterns to remember PINs
- Good security in recessionary times
- Tough economic climate can heighten insider threat
- Poll: Two thirds of users never change passwords
- IBM, Secret Service, others study identity/cybercrime issues
- Strange account management at Amazon
- Crimes, anonymity and the Net
- IBM vets ID management, access control on own systems
- Top 10 ways collaboration, mobility amplify data leakage dangers: Cisco study
- After password glitch, Firefox patch due next week
Security Essentials
- Good security in recessionary times
- Security ROI: Fact or Fiction?
- NetWitness releases free version of security software
- Study: critical infrastructure often under cyberattack
- Crooks can make $5M a year shilling fake security software
- Sun exec: IT security should follow business needs
- Clumsy staff more dangerous than hackers: survey
- When the watchdog is the underdog
- Mafiaboy grows up; a hacker seeks redemption
- Ouch! Security pros' worst mistakes
TechWorld Jobs (beta)
Recent Jobs
TechWorld Blogs
-

TalkingTech
The view from the top of IT with TechWorld Editor Rodney Gedda
-

Entrenched
Cooking up better code, IDG's developers reveal some of their secrets
-

Broadband Voice
Darren Pauli digs in from the front line of Australia's broadband battleground
Recent blog posts
- An open storage stack? I like the sound of that
- The mobile clone wars: fighting for a better phone experience
- Stopping the "Clean Feed"
- Identifying web platforms
- Clean Feed ‘not technically possible’
- No Clean Feed - well duh!
- Conroy's content cops still on the cards
- Will open source ruin the economy? Please help
- Linux kernel 2.6.27 is out!
- Falling off the ob_start stack
Recent comments
- Hello this is Brianna
7 hours 29 min ago - Turn any PC into a media center
21 hours 20 min ago - How About the Correct Title?
1 day 12 hours ago - who are you kidding?
1 day 17 hours ago - Seriously, how much did they pay for this advertisement
3 days 8 hours ago - SF Bay Area - free Seminar on Enterprise Cloud Computing
3 days 11 hours ago - video conferening but not telepresence...
3 days 18 hours ago - SAMSUNG OLED 40" TECHNOLOGY
4 days 3 hours ago - What was the question again, oh well this was prepared earlier
6 days 10 hours ago - Worldwide broadband prices continue to drop which means ? in AU
6 days 10 hours ago - Not a Problem Here in Australia and New Zealand
1 week 1 day ago - Clear the air
1 week 2 days ago - Tabbed browsing, Quick Find,
1 week 5 days ago - Microsoft details plans for new social bookmarking tool
1 week 6 days ago - There is a 3rd party tool
2 weeks 1 day ago - Demise of Windows
2 weeks 1 day ago - new OS
2 weeks 1 day ago - Re: Favicon
2 weeks 2 days ago - Multi Camera Kino
2 weeks 2 days ago - Favicon
2 weeks 3 days ago



