IP contact centers are proliferating, but they still pose a set of potential gotchas that businesses need to beware of as they consider upgrading from the TDM world, experts say.
Hidden costs, personnel considerations and cripplingly complex integration are among possible pitfalls corporations face as they make the shift to more feature rich and flexible IP centers.
With more than half of all contact centers still based on TDM, the bulk of contact center executives still face tough decisions about how to successfully migrate from one technology to another, says Sheila McGee-Smith, president of McGee-Smith analytics. Here are some of the challenges they face:
Start with the basics: The underlying IP network might not be fit to support the contact center. "Voice quality is so much more important in contact centers," says Matthias Machowinski, an analyst with Infonetics. "It's the No.1 thing."
As a result, in general adoption of IP contact centers lags adoption of IP voice. "Businesses are reluctant because of reliability concerns and voice quality," he says.
So before deployment, a full network assessment is called for to gauge QoS and ensure the levels required to support professional grade quality to handle customer-facing calls.
It is essential to consider call quality for each type of agent based on location, because they will access the contact center over varying infrastructure. For instance, the call quality for an agent working from home depends not only on the corporate infrastructure, but the quality of the broadband service to the agent's home and even the agent's home network, Machowinski says.
Businesses should tap the in-house VoIP expertise that they may have developed for their non-contact center calling. This should be readily available because typically companies are willing to use VoIP on calls within the company but not to outside parties, McGee-Smith says. "They're willing to have IP on intra-company calls, but to take orders or support customer service they are more reluctant to use IP contact centers because of quality issues. Usually you're the last man standing," she says.
Sticking with your current call center vendor could reap big cost benefits, but maybe not. "Do I attempt to keep what applications I have as I migrate to IP or do I scuttle the whole thing and start again?" McGee-Smith says. "If you use the vendor you have, there are may be issues with upgrading."
Latest on IP Phones
- T-Mobile ties Wi-Fi BlackBerries to PBXes
- iSoft preaches best-of-breed for UC
- Telepresence shatters communication barriers
- IP contact centers pose significant challenges
- Citrix buys high-def video conferencing player
- Avaya puts voicemail into written words
- Unified communications products abound
- Networkers 08: Virtual office to meet cloud computing
- Cisco Virtual Office package targets teleworkers
- Procter & Gamble cites progress, issues with TelePresence
Unified Comms Essentials
- Enterprises baffled by unified communications, survey finds
- Efficiency key to Avaya's success, Giancarlo says
- Unified Comms forge ahead in the enterprise
- Mobile UC: the ultimate end game
- Merlin takes magic out of UC collaboration
- Unified communications takes center field at ballpark
- Still early in the game for unified communications
- Nortel goes open source for unified communications
- The Cisco/Microsoft battle for unified communications
- C# .NET Developers13/03/2010
Other
I.T. & T
C# .NET Developers - Application Architect/Lead - Java (C4)13/03/2010
Other
I.T. & T
Application Architect/Lead - Java (C4) - Change Manager - (Operational, Call Centre exp. required)13/03/2010
Other
I.T. & T
Change Manager - (Operational, Call Centre exp. required) - SAS DI Developer - Major Project lines!13/03/2010
Other
I.T. & T
SAS DI Developer - Major Project lines! - VBA/Excel/C#/VB.NET Developer13/03/2010
Other
I.T. & T
VBA/Excel/C#/VB.NET Developer - Senior Infrastructure Specialist13/03/2010
Other
I.T. & T
Senior Infrastructure Specialist - Program Coordinator (C4)13/03/2010
Other
I.T. & T
Program Coordinator (C4)
Whitepapers
-
How NOT to Wreck Your Windows 7 Migration | Guidelines for Planning and Executing a Successful Windows 7 Migration -
Legacy Tools: Not Built for Today’s Helpdesk -
IDC opinion paper | Quantifying the business value of VMware View -
Beyond PCI Checklists: Securing Cardholder Data with enhanced File Integrity Monitoring -
Maximising customer capital
TechWorld Blogs
Recent blog posts
- All aboard the Avatar Economy
- Facebook, PayPal tie up ad payments
- Google goes for more markets: too much too quickly?
- Talk about mobile computing
- iPad arrives: can Apple crack the tablet?
- Linux.conf.au 2010 kicks off in New Zealand
- VMware jumps further into SaaS with Zimbra
- Amarok 2.2.2 released – rock on!
- Happy Nexus Year
- So long 2009, and thanks for another decade in tech
Recent comments
- HTC DESIRE FOR $360USD
9 min 1 sec ago - not for us
2 hours 14 min ago - Any related jobs
18 hours 45 min ago - epic phail
1 day 12 hours ago - We should all be familiar by
1 day 21 hours ago - eFront Rocks!!!
2 days 7 hours ago - I have an eris, and I have
2 days 17 hours ago - I think free offerings are
3 days 16 min ago - John Lindsay
3 days 13 hours ago - e Front looks best as far as
4 days 6 hours ago - How are they thinking to face to brazilian corruption on telecom
5 days 2 hours ago - want free call
6 days 3 hours ago - Very Useful information ,
6 days 5 hours ago - A challenge to Google?
1 week 16 hours ago - Oh come on...
1 week 16 hours ago - It doesn't mater what you think
1 week 1 day ago - hi aman i m pankaj, i have
1 week 1 day ago - Fax over the internet
1 week 2 days ago - With the use of femtocell
1 week 2 days ago - Hi all,
There is hype on the
1 week 2 days ago





Comments
Post new comment