Turning off disk defragmenter may solve a sluggish PC
- 11 April, 2009 05:42
- Comments
For the last couple months I've been troubleshooting a vexing problem on my new quad-core HP desktop: Roughly once per week, the machine would start running as slow as molasses.
And I mean slow: Programs would take several minutes to load, and even simple activities like switching browser tabs were maddeningly sluggish. Curiously, this behavior would last for several hours, and then the system would be back to normal.
Knowing a thing or two about PCs, I tried all kinds of remedies. I checked for viruses and spyware. I ran memory and hard-drive tests. I uninstalled a few potentially culpable (or so I thought) programs, including HP's junkware. I even disabled a few Windows services (like Search and SuperFetch), which some fellow users suggested could be to blame.
Nothing worked. I even went so far as to wipe the hard drive and reload Windows (Vista x64, in case you were wondering), even though the system was barely a month old. That did the trick--for about a week.
This got so irksome that I started venting about it on Facebook. And that's when an old high-school buddy (you rock, Scooter!) came to the rescue. He suggested I check Windows' Disk Defragmenter. Sure enough, it was set to Run on a schedule, and the last time it ran matched up with the most recent slowdown.
Suddenly it all made sense: The non-stop hard-disk activity, the out-of-the-blue recurrence of the slowdowns, and the eventual return to normal. The only thing I couldn't figure out was why I never spotted Disk Defragmenter when I was poking around Task Manager. It was as though it was running so far behind the scenes as to be invisible.
I've since disabled the feature, and to date I haven't had a single slowdown. Granted, it's barely been two weeks, but I'm 98% sure this was the root of the problem.
What about keeping my hard drive defragmented? I can do that manually, once a month or so, on my schedule. In the meantime, where do I file a bug report with Microsoft? I suspect this might be a glitch in the 64-bit version of Vista. Let me know if you've encountered similar behavior and, if so, whether you were able to resolve it.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email TechWorld
- Follow TechWorld on twitter
- Seven Tips for Securing Mobile Workers
- Spear Phishing Attacks - Why they are successful and how to stop them
- Top 10 Mistakes in Data Centre Operations: Operating Efficient and Effective Data Centers
- Reconciling Datacenter consolidation and security: It starts with an integrated approach
- Optimised Data Protection for VMware® Environments with Symantec NetBackup™ Appliances
-
Jailbreak of Apple iOS 5.1.1 due 'in days'
-
Nokia launches new Windows Phones
-
Nokia Lumia 900, 610 heading Down Under
-
Consider desktops in the cloud for BYOD
-
Samsung Apps store hits 100 million downloads
-
Computers for Seniors for Dummies, 2nd Edition
-
Office 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
MYOB Software for Dummies 6E Australian Edition
-
Office 2007 for Dummies
-
Windows 7 for Dummies® Dvd+book Bundle
-
Teach Yourself Visually Windows 7
-
Windows 7 for Seniors for Dummies®
-
Microsoft Office
-
Excel 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies







Comments
Post new comment