Linux out, Windows in at Electoral Commission
- 29 April, 2009 12:06
- Comments 3
The NSW Electoral Commission (NSWEC) will leave Linux for Windows Server when it develops its new vote counting and reporting application, which is slated to cost $1.4 million over the next two years.
NSWEC information systems manager Ian Brightwell said the desire to redevelop the application relates to the difficulty in supporting a legacy development environment.
“It's half PowerBuilder and half Java for batch processes and this environment is increasingly difficult to support,” Brightwell said.
“There is a swing library for UI development which is also not easy to support.”
Running on an Oracle 9i database on a “specific version” of Linux, the application will be modernised in .Net on Oracle 11g on Windows Server 2008.
Most applications are already using Oracle 10g at the NSWEC, but the road map is to port everything to Oracle 11g on Windows.
Brightwell said the organisation had a previous bad experience with Linux which helped it decide to move to Windows.
“We first tried out 10g on Linux on a HP server which had processor management features that Linux did not support so we had to make an eleventh hour move to Windows,” he said.
“We are a small organisation and when you have experiences like that you don't rush back there. We can't test whether Linux is compatible with hardware and compatibility can be problematic with Linux.”
Brightwell said the NSWEC has been able to solve all its technical problems with Windows through its partnership with Microsoft so it is a case of “reducing risk” by choosing Windows.
The NSWEC has limited in-house development resources with only “six people at the most”, which is why is is seeking a partner for this software development project.
This applications is not related to electronic voting as the voting process has a number of aspects, including administration (electoral roll) and the process of voting which is all paper-based. Then there is the counting and recording of votes.
Brightwell said the NSWEC would consider requests for the new software to be released to the public for scrutiny, but “we have never had that request”.
“In practical terms our concern is these systems are large and complex and require precise skills to understand and, as such, if someone did have trouble interpreting it that would place a large burden on our resources. It's a cost resource impact issue that is our major concern,” he said.
That said, the NSWEC does have people audit the software in “critical parts” of the system.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email TechWorld
- Follow TechWorld on twitter
- EMC 15-Minute Guide to Smarter Backup Transform your future
- Teleworking made simple—and secure—with desktop virtualisation technology
- Key Considerations in Modernising Your Backup and Deduplication Solutions
- A buyer’s guide to application lifecycle management (ALM) solutions
- Enterprise Buyers Guide for Printers
-
Coalition NBN better or worse?
-
CSIRO develops hands-free technology for mining repairs
-
Broadband Forum to improve IPTV performance with new spec
-
Amazon Web Services moves backups to cloud with new appliance
-
Callforfree.net.au offers free calls to 70 countries
-
Excel 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
MYOB Software for Dummies 6E Australian Edition
-
Computers for Seniors for Dummies, 2nd Edition
-
Office 2007 for Dummies
-
Microsoft Office
-
Teach Yourself Visually Windows 7
-
Office 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Windows 7 for Dummies® Dvd+book Bundle
-
Windows 7 for Seniors for Dummies®
Comments
dave b.
yeah and i'm bill gates
Um.... oracle ... has a few products 11g + THEIR UNBREAKABLE LINUX. ... yeah um... go back to square one.
Anonymous
They're idiots.
I think everyone at this company likes the idea of padding their Resumes with MS fan boy stuff. They really don't care what it's costing the company.
Let's go MS for the sake of bettering our Resumes and guaranteed job security by having to continuously maintain these apps and the servers they run on, rather than fix the problem, yeah yeah let's do it.
Anonymous
Processor Management Features?
That sounds like a very peculiar reason why anyone "had to" switch platforms. There's a whole lot of Linux servers running on HP/Compaq hardware doing pretty well at managing their processors, it's hard to imagine what this ultra-essential management feature might have been.
I have seen that HP hardware has a system of reporting hardware faults that feeds through the NMI line, and no linux supports the protocol *OUT OF THE BOX* but you can easily download the HP/Compaq proprietary modules to support that system (presumably equally on Microsoft platforms, the support comes as a vendor package). Once you get that system, it just gives a more detailed error message when the hardware is faulty, you still have to replace hardware until you get it fixed (no different to what you would be doing anyways).
Post new comment