Artifex Software is suing Palm over the PDF (Portable Document Format) viewer in Palm's Pre smartphone, it said on Thursday.
Artifex alleges that Palm has copied Artifex's PDF rendering engine, called muPDF, and integrated it into the Palm Pre's PDF viewer application without the proper licensing conditions.
Artifex requires that an entire application must be licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL) if muPDF is part of the application.
If the software is not licensed under the GNU GPL, then Artifex requires a commercial license in order to use muPDF, according to the company's licensing terms.
Artifex alleges that Palm has done neither and has filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Palm's documentation for the Pre includes a mention of muPDF, which it says has been licensed under the GNU GPL.
Palm Europe did not reply to questions about the lawsuit. The Pre was announced at the Consumer Electronics Show in January and went on sale in the U.S in June.
References
Latest on Licensing
- Software Patents Hurt Everyone, But Especially SMBs
- Q&A with Richard Stallman
- Linux Foundation offers open source compliance checklist
- Court patent ruling leaves software patents intact
- Appeals body ducks question of software patentability
- Novell, Red Hat prevail in user-interface patent case
- Google exec worries over 'rudderless' Java
- IBM executive denies open-source sellout
- Open-source advocate enters IBM antitrust fray
- FSF to Google: Free the On2 video codec
Open Source Essentials
- Microsoft 'interested' in open source browser: Ballmer
- Flying high with open source
- Open sourcing code may improve transparency on Wall Street
- Problem-solvers hunt open-source solutions
- Open source advocates hail appeals court ruling
- Open-source software a security risk, study claims
- Insurance company bets health on open source
- Open source stack solid foundation for All Homes
- 20 great Windows open source projects you should get to know
- Via releases laptop design as open source
- WebSphere Solution Design (S20) - CBD, contract role3/09/2010
Other
I.T. & T
WebSphere Solution Design (S20) - CBD, contract role - Solution Architect - Web Application Architecture Project!3/09/2010
Other
I.T. & T
Solution Architect to provide strategic and operational consulting for the end-to-end Web Application System project! Experienced with J2EE or .NET?! - Principal Consultant - ITIL2/09/2010
Other
I.T. & T
Excellent opportunity for an experienced ITIL Principal Consultant to join an innovative leading IT Service management consultancy. Attractive packag - Mainframe Developer - COBOL - 12 Month Contract2/09/2010
Other
I.T. & T
Mainframe Developer - COBOL - 12 Month Contract - Business Systems Analyst2/09/2010
Other
I.T. & T
Perm CBD based role for an experienced Business Systems Analyst - Senior SAP Project Manager2/09/2010
Other
I.T. & T
Senior SAP Project Manager - SAP FICO Consultant - 6 week contract - West Sydney2/09/2010
Other
I.T. & T
SAP FICO Consultant - 6 week contract - West Sydney
TechWorld Blogs
Recent blog posts
- Windows Phone 7: how big can it get?
- NBN gets a turn at political football
- Internet filter gets caught up in politics
- TechWorld Forums goes live
- Selective sourcing the hybrid of cloud services
- Social networks catch more business attention
- RIP Kin
- Telstra’s copper and NBN’s fibre: will the two ends meet?
- RIP Windows 2000, XP lives on
- Does the world need another iPhone? Why not
Recent comments
- java development
11 hours 37 min ago - When mine called they
12 hours 20 min ago - 3D TV cannot fall - no way! Why?
15 hours 34 min ago - Thanks for taking the time to
1 day 3 hours ago - Windows scam
1 day 11 hours ago - My only anti fraud method is
2 days 6 hours ago - Private Cloud Taxonomies
2 days 6 hours ago - ...however...
2 days 15 hours ago - This Guy
2 days 15 hours ago - Glasses Free technology
2 days 16 hours ago - FOSS community
2 days 23 hours ago - i have dv6000 with nvidia
3 days 38 min ago - i have dv6000 and suddenly
3 days 43 min ago - This is an awesome comment.
3 days 4 hours ago - Real Estate
3 days 6 hours ago - Scam - eventvwr scammers
3 days 10 hours ago - Well I never...
5 days 1 hour ago - Too bad Microsoft was mentioned
5 days 3 hours ago - Phone card is a better option to make calls at a lower rate
5 days 7 hours ago - In other words: "Developers,
5 days 13 hours ago










Comments
Not even GPLed
From the mupdf README:
This code is under the same licensing scheme as Ghostscript.
AFPL and one year or major release later GPL.
Because there have been no major releases yet; AFPL it is.
If there were copyright notices on the source files, they've been stripped off.
Alternative
They must publish the source code to the PDF viewer _or_ restructure it in a way it doesn't link to muPDF.
Or they can contact the copyright holder (if there is a single point of contact) of muPDF and offer to license it to Palm under, say, LGPL, for a fee. This would help finance the development of muPDF.
I think this last option would be preferrable to forcing Palm to open up its PDF viewer. Is it _that_ interesting?
No, not that
John, to comply with GPL it is insufficient to provide the source code for the open-source library USED in the project. Rather, if you use that library you must likewise provide the source code for your OWN derivative project using it.
Since Palm didn't provide all the source code of their PDF viewer, they are not in complying with the terms of license.
I don't know, John.
What is the name of the PDF application on the Pre? If the source code for that is available then they have complied with the requirements.
Simply providing the source code for MuPDF is not enough.
Dear John,
Its not enough just to send back the patches, if they link to it (and it looks like they do) they need to release the source code they wrote too.
Yes that, but not that…
Thats not the source to the palm viewer, thats the source to mupdf. What this is saying is that the palm viewer is clearly based on mupdf but it isn't being distributed in accordance with the license.
The artifex folks have had the "GPL or, at your option, commercial license" model now for over 20 years now and they have quite a few clueful people around. I doubt they'd screw up on this.
You mean this?
http://opensource.palm.com/1.3.1/index.html
http://palm.cdnetworks.net/opensource/1.3.1/mupdf-1.0.tar
http://palm.cdnetworks.net/opensource/1.3.1/mupdf-1.0.tar-patches.tgz
Post new comment