Friday 3 September, 2010
Red Hat open sources desktop application protocol
The company posits its SPICE protocol as a next-generation RDP or ICA

Red Hat has open sourced a virtual desktop protocol it acquired last year, called the Simple Protocol for Independent Computing Environment (SPICE), in the hope of fostering its wider adoption.

Red Hat is using SPICE as one of the components of its Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization for Desktops application, which should be released within a few months, according to Jim Brennan, senior product marketing manager at Red Hat.

By making SPICE open source, the company hopes other vendors will use it for their own virtual desktop offerings. Red Hat has set up a Web site and a mailing list to try to foster community involvement.

Red Hat acquired SPICE in 2008 when it purchased Qumranet.

Qumranet used SPICE for its own commercial desktop-virtualization product, called SolidIce.

SPICE can be used to deploy virtual desktops from a server out to remote computers, such as desktop PCs and thin-client devices.

It resembles other rendering protocols used for remote desktop management and deployment, such as Microsoft's Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) or Citrix's Independent Computing Architecture (ICA).

Brennan said SPICE has advantages over those other protocols, in that SPICE can dynamically customize desktop instances to fit specific operating environments.

"It was designed with a tiered architecture," he said. Processing can be divided between the remote device and the server, either at the hypervisor or the virtual desktop level.

If the protocol senses that the remote client has some excess graphics processing capability, for instance, it will dynamically offload some of the visualization work to that device, freeing up capacity on the server.

At present, SPICE will support rendering virtual instances of Microsoft Windows XP and Windows 7, as well as Red Hat Enterprise Linux. At the server level, it runs on 64-bit Linux platforms.

As more companies participate in SPICE, more OSes should be made available at both the client and server level, Brennan predicted.

In addition to SPICE, the Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization for Desktops package will also include a stripped-down version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux version 5.4, with the KVM virtualization module compiled in, as well as desktop management software called the Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager for Desktops.

Red Hat placed most of the SPICE code under the GNU General Public License version 2, though parts are also licensed under Lesser GPL (LGPL) and BSD-styled licenses.

Comments

Get a life!

Anon @ 1:03 : Considering that it was so named by a COMMERCIAL company that was bought out by RedHat, prior to it being open-sourced... The main reason it's "confusing" is not because of naming (also keep in mind that people looking for Virtualization Remote Desktops won't be looking for the electronic simulation package- or the other way around...) it's more because many people want simple solutions FORCEFED to them.

just some small issues

I think the term Free Software is a more complete and admirable term to use in this article than Open Source.

Open Source is software for which the source code is freely and publicly available, though the specific licensing agreements vary as to what one is allowed to do with that code. But that really isn't what Red Hat has done here. Red Hat has given us all 4 specific freedoms:

0. the freedom to run the program for any reason we see fit
1. the freedom to study the program and change it if we want to
2. the freedom to redistribute copies (something that "open source" doesn't always allow)
3. the freedom to improve the software and release it to the public for the benefit of all

Also the expression “BSD-style license” leads to confusion because it lumps together licenses that have important differences. For instance, the original BSD license with the advertising clause is incompatible with the GNU General Public License, but the revised BSD license is compatible with the GPL.

To avoid confusion, it is best to name the specific license in question and avoid the vague term “BSD-style.”

hah!

take a few deep breaths. this is a rather common situation in all product naming. breath deeply. relax. try to focus on breathing in troubled red smoke, and exhaling calming blue smoke. you can transform your experiences by observing and modifying your responses to stimuli like these.

spice?

SPICE is already the name of an open source piece of software. Why does the linux community insist on creating a world that is so amazingly confusing for average people? I'm sick to death of being asked why linux isn't used by more people. Please stop doing stupid crap like this.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Enter the fully qualified URL, eg. http://www.example.com/
Users posting comments agree to the Techworld Australia comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Syndicate content Syndicate content Syndicate content Syndicate content Syndicate content Syndicate content
 
Jobs

Recent comments

- + c

Techworld Australia Member Login

c