Ubuntu Studio says no to Unity, adopts Xfce

KDE, GNOME 3 also given cold shoulder

An example Xfce 4.8 desktop environment

An example Xfce 4.8 desktop environment

In another sign Canonical’s Unity desktop environment is not resonating well with the wider Ubuntu community, multimedia-centric Ubuntu derivative, Ubuntu Studio, will move from the GNOME to the Xfce desktop for its next release.

Last month Ubuntu Studio celebrated the 11.04 ‘Natty Narwhal’ release with the rest of the Ubuntu community, but unlike the main Ubuntu release did not turn on the Unity desktop and instead opted to keep GNOME as the default interface.

“Ubuntu Studio does not currently use Unity. As the user logs in it will default to Gnome Classic Desktop (i.e. Gnome2),” according the Ubuntu Studio 11.04 release notes.

Read the rest of the 11.04 release notes here: Ubuntu Studio 11.04 ‘Natty Narwhal’ release notes.

However, just this weekend, the Ubuntu Studio project went one step further and announced it was moving away from Unity and GNOME to the open source Xfce desktop as the default environment.

Ubuntu Studio developer Scott Lavender wrote on his blog the project will be moving to Xfce, a desktop environment promoted as being “lightweight and fast”.

Lavender wrote Ubuntu’s decision to go with Unity raised concerns regarding how the new desktop would “affect the typical Ubuntu Studio user’s work flow”.

“The consensus within the team is that Unity was not an optimal choice for Ubuntu Studio at this time,” according to Lavender.

The Studio developers considered using the ‘classic’ GNOME desktop, but since it won’t be shipped with the next Ubuntu release — 11.10 ‘Oneiric Ocelot’ — they concluded questions remain around the ongoing support of GNOME packages, particularly gnome-panel, by Canonical.

“Therefore, it quickly became evident that staying with GNOME panel as our default DE did not represent a viable choice for project sustainability,” Lavender wrote.

The Studio developers believe Xfce has advantages over GNOME, KDE and Unity because it provides a “familiar desktop metaphor” and is a more “resource friendly environment”.

Xfce and GNOME both use the GTK+ libraries to develop their graphical interfaces. But with the release of GNOME 3 last month, the GNOME Shell UI is taking the project in a new direction on the desktop.

While pushing the innovation bar for a free desktop, both Ubuntu’s Unity and GNOME 3 have attracted criticism for being too radical a departure from their GNOME 2 tradition on the desktop. A few years ago KDE’s move version 4 attracted the same kind of criticism.

The Ubuntu Studio developers will also use the move to Xfce as an opportunity to explore updating the distribution’s user interface.

The Xfce project is online at:

Follow Rodney Gedda on Twitter: @rodneygedda

Follow TechWorld Australia on Twitter: @Techworld_AU

Tags multimediaLinuxUbuntu Studioopen sourceXfceunitygnomeubuntu

More about KDEKDEUbuntu

1 Comment



I think the saddest part of the entire thing is how the community has been ignored, in the entire fiasco. When Gnome 3 was released.. most of us groaned. Sure, there are some happy users.. but a lot of those people are those who seem unable to customize/modify their own desktops, in the first place. It's one thing to be lazily content with what is farted in our general direction, but some of us are clearly feeling antagonized by the new trend of destroying customization. Try to make Unity or Gnome 3 look unique - It's nearly impossible.. by design.

.. I won't even get started on what bothers me about Unity, in particular.. but the whole Gnome vs Unity vs Everything Else-thing is not good for the state of Linux-user-confusion. The fragmentation of the distributions is confusing enough, for newcomers, but the landscape of desktop environments, compounded by the interchangeable window managers / decorators / other pieces of the puzzle, has remained a huge turn-off. Unity should have sought to bring people together under an umbrella of simplicity, but it has divided us even farther apart.. to the point that I truly wonder what will become of Gnome and Canonical.

Too much political posturing has been applied to this junk, yknow? It's like they're not allowed to admit that the desktop environments they're pushing, are not as good as they at first thought. Not being able to admit fault is a political feature that has no place in the open source arena.

I often wonder how much of this was predicted, prior to the release of Gnome 3. Xfce seemed to balloon to the size of Gnome 2, immediately prior to Gnome 2's discontinuation. Similar timing for LXDE usurping Xfce's position as "the lightweight DE" ..

..the whole thing is very fishy.. somewhat big business-feeling, to me.

Comments are now closed

Top Whitepapers

Twitter Feed

Featured Whitepapers