NBN decision: better broadband or bigger bureaucracy?
So the federal government has thrown down the gauntlet and decided to go ahead and lead from the front to create the National Broadband Network with the help of private industry. Amid all the commotion about Telstra's omission from the original proposal, a new government department to build and manage the NBN appears decidedly ironic. Telstra was Australia's national phone and data services company, the industry was deregulated with the aim of introducing more competition, Telstra inherited all the taxpayer-funded infrastructure, deregulation failed to deliver a high-speed national network, ADSL deployments were hampered by access restrictions and Telstra's unwillingness to cannibalise existing cable investments, and now the government wants to start again under the guise of another national infrastructure business. Talk about deja vu.
The $43 billion question is, of course, will the government get it right this time or are we in for more bungling bureaucracy?
Given the ongoing post-deregulation climate surrounding Telstra and its reluctance to co-operate with the other carriers, the government's NBN decision does seem like a “good” one (anything, and I mean anything that promotes more competition in the data networking space is good), but it also begs the question of why this couldn't have happened within the auspices of the government-owned Telstra of 10 years ago.
It's not an easy question to answer, but a good place to start would be to examine how deregulation happened, not why.
Deregulation promotes competition, however, there will only be full competition if the basic building block is available to all commercial entities equally.
Instead, the modern Telstra wholesale and retail businesses just inherited all the public communications infrastructure under the guise of “deregulation”.
A far more open approach would have been to keep all the public assets – the exchanges, the cabling, etc – in government hands (call it a separate government business if you will, how about ATIC – Australian Telecommunications Infrastructure Corporation?), and allow all carriers – including Telstra – to lease access it at wholesale rates.
The retail arms of the carriers then go ahead and sell it to consumers in the form of telephone and Internet access services, and ATIC as a wholesaler only has no retail presence and therefore no conflict of interest – unlike our friend the Big T!
The revenue raised through selling access then gets ploughed back into maintaining and upgrading the network – no questions asked about “access permissions”.
With this architecture, the existing national infrastructure just becomes the NBN, and there's no need to re-create a special “NBN” in parallel.
Today's announcement seems remarkably similar to what might have been if deregulation prevented the infrastructure from falling into Telstra's lap the way it did.
Only time will tell if Rudd and Conroy's nation building exercise will reap the broadband services Australian consumers and businesses so desperately require. Broadband or no broadband, one thing's for sure – there will me more bureaucracy.
In this White Paper, IDC offers up some quantifiable benefits that Asian enterprises have observed as a result of deploying backup and recovery solutions. · Many enterprises are finding that the backup and recovery processes and technologies that they have implemented have not kept pace with the demands of the business · IDC identifies how organizations can experience savings and improvements from the deployment of different types of technologies · The benefits fall into three categories: storage environment cost savings; end-user productivity enhancements; and IT staff productivity optimization
- CCTech Support | IT Services Firm - Ad hoc Projects - Echuca AreaVIC
- FTProgram Manager - Integration & SolutionsNSW
- FTSearch/SEO/SEM/PPC - Multiple OpportunitiesVIC
- FTStudio Design ManagerVIC
- CCTech Support | IT Services Firm - Ad hoc Projects - Port Augusta / Whyalla AreaSA
- FTAcquisition Marketing ExceutiveNSW
- FTSearch/SEO/SEM/PPC - Multiple OpportunitiesNSW
Mobile devices are not just another type of endpoint. Inherent features (e.g., camera, accelerometer, proximity sensor, etc.) coupled with the always-connected, readily available nature of these devices represent an opportunity for improvement in enterprise user productivity. Enterprises can begin to realize this potential by allowing use of corporate data in both custom-built and commercially available mobile apps. Mobile workflows resulting from interactions between these apps can be faster and more intuitive than those on a PC. However, the need to always retain control over corporate data should give an enterprise pause before sanctioning the widespread use of sensitive business information on mobile devices.
- Startup SQLdep aims to help DBAs stay sane
- BlackBerry's deal to buy voice crypto company Secusmart blessed by German government
- Apple's Black Friday sale includes iPhone for the first time
- France, Germany want EU to take a tougher stance on tech firms
- Coming soon: Murder by Internet
- Distracted? Slap this Hitachi gizmo on your forehead to focus
- Uber suspends Nevada operations, affecting nearly 1,000 jobs
- Sony confirms development of e-paper smartwatch
- Sydney Startup Weekend doubles attendance in one year
- ASIC unhappy with exclusion from data retention regime
- Australian Internet Security Initiative portal launched to help ISPs
- How SBS scaled up for FIFA World Cup online
- Hail pounds telecom networks in Queensland
- RMIT University builds virtual networking labs for students
- Weather.com fixes web application vulnerabilities