Internet filter gets caught up in politics
It was a long time coming, but the coalition has done what many predicted was inevitable and formally opposed the government’s mandatory Internet filter policy. Good politics or a knee-jerk reaction during the campaign trail? Let’s investigate. I would have liked to see more discussion from the opposition when the concept of ISP filtering became mainstream – and frequent – technology news.
A very short history of the idea began with the Howard government a decade ago (then opposed by Labor) and has since been openly pursued by the Labor government and its communications minister Stephen Conroy.
Over the past few years Labor’s progressive introduction of the scheme has attracted vocal criticism from many in the IT community and all other walks of life – even the Sex Party.
The problem is not so much the intention, but the implementation.
Most people don’t care if lurid material is filtered from the Internet, but having a central filter to achieve this is bound to be beyond the scope of what is aimed to be achieved.
Why? Because content that they don’t want to be filtered will invariably end up being filtered and that level of censorship goes against our basic principles.
For this election campaign the question is whether the coalition really cares about people’s liberties or is it just trying to swoop on what it can see as being bad policy.
Me thinks it’s the latter. The policy of ISP filtering is a dismal failure. Rudd should have seen that long ago.
There will always be people who are interesting in politics and support one particular party and there will always be those who are apolitical and don’t care about party politics at all, but when one party introduces a policy that has the potential to infringe the right of the apathy then suddenly all those people will be influenced to vote against a political party on the basis of policy.
Labor should have seen the writing on the wall. Organised street protests of thousands of people against the potential of a political party’s policy? Come on, that should have set alarm bells of right from the start. Remember, this thing isn’t even law yet.
All the people that didn’t care which way they voted in this upcoming election now suddenly do have a reason to vote in a particular direction.
By announcing its opposition to Internet filtering the coalition has essentially found itself “appealing” the apathy.
Today I received a media release from SAGE-AU (yeah, apparently it still exists) welcoming the opposition’s stand on the Internet filter. Talk about swinging voters.
IT and politics generally don’t mix. But when the latter starts to impede the rights of the former the wider population understands very quickly how important information is in their lives and people are prepared to act to defend their rights.
In this White Paper, IDC offers up some quantifiable benefits that Asian enterprises have observed as a result of deploying backup and recovery solutions. · Many enterprises are finding that the backup and recovery processes and technologies that they have implemented have not kept pace with the demands of the business · IDC identifies how organizations can experience savings and improvements from the deployment of different types of technologies · The benefits fall into three categories: storage environment cost savings; end-user productivity enhancements; and IT staff productivity optimization
- FTAcquisition Marketing ExceutiveNSW
- CCTech Support | IT Services Firm - Ad hoc Projects - Port Augusta / Whyalla AreaSA
- FTProgram Manager - Integration & SolutionsNSW
- FTStudio Design ManagerVIC
- FTSenior SEO ManagerNSW
- CCWeb / Mobile Developer - Magento - HTML5, CSS - Excellent CMS SkillsNSW
- FTSearch/SEO/SEM/PPC - Multiple OpportunitiesNSW
- CCTech Support | IT Services Firm - Ad hoc Projects - Echuca AreaVIC
- FTStudio Design ManagerVIC
- FTChief Information Officer - CSIROACT
To improve business processes and gain efficiency, its important to identify the signs that your ITSM solution is outdated, inefficient or both. In this paper we look at key questions'you should be asking, such as: • Is your IT staff still using time-consuming manual methods to address common service requests and IT requirements? • Does your organisation lack an automated Service Request Management (SRM) system? • Is your current ITSM solution able to support all your IT reporting and information needs?
- Spliddit: Algorithms to divide the rent, stuff, or credit fairly between people
- Why is Microsoft updating Windows PCs for a security bug on the server?
- Prices for 4K monitors sink below $500
- Apple's $450 million e-books settlement gets final approval
- Black Friday: Newegg axes prices on laptops, desktops, tablets and more
- Reports: EU taking first step towards breaking up Google
- Double-edged feedback sword nicks Microsoft over OneDrive
- The ups and downs of Microsoft Band
- US man sentenced for hacking POS systems at Subway
- FCC chairman gives no timeline for net neutrality decision
- Connected-home Babel: There's an app for that, startup says
- Flurry of hydrogen fuel cell cars challenge all-electric vehicles
- Mozilla reports flat revenue from Google-Firefox search deal
- Apple delivers another Yosemite beta as WiFi issues persist
- UpCloud bets on storage performance, US datacenter to dent market