A newly minted Linux a must for the desktop
Last week I wrote about how Linux distributors could do more in the way of integration work and usability testing to cement Linux’s place on the desktop. The release of Linux Mint 10 on Friday is a good reminder of how some people remain hard at work to achieve that goal. By way of a backgrounder, Linux Mint is based on Ubuntu which is in turn based on Debian GNU/Linux.
The idea behind using an existing Linux distribution as a “base” for another is the hope of less development and testing requirements. Standing “on the shoulders of giants”, so to speak.
One reader commented that Linux already has a higher install base than Mac OS X.
While that might be true (with Linux being free to distribute it’s always going to be impossible to know exactly), it doesn’t mean Linux is living up to its full potential on the desktop.
My argument is not that Linux distributions should try to be like Windows or Mac OS X, my argument is they should care more about the end-user experience. And shipping stable, integrated software is key to that.
Windows and Mac OS X both appeal to non-technical people because a lot of administration tasks are either automated or only involve pointing and clicking.
Of course, that doesn’t mean Linux is difficult to use. But the lack of integration can be off-putting for someone who has never used it before.
In fact, there’s absolutely no reason why a free operating system can’t exceed the user experience of a commercial one.
Take a look at the success of Android on mobile devices for a good example of what can be done with a free operating system when it’s tightly integrated with the hardware.
In the case of Linux Mint, people keep raving on about how easy to use it is and how little tinkering is required for things to “just work”.
Mint has a strong focus on integration and testing and, in addition leveraging Ubuntu, develops its own software for system and software management.
While not as well known as commercial-backed distributions like openSUSE, Mint now claims to be the third most popular (the ranks can vary after a new release), according to Linux portal Distrowatch. It’s somewhat of a dark horse among Linux distributions.
For Linux Mint to become so popular without much help from the media is a testament to its appeal.
Where does that leave the upstream distributions like Debian and Ubuntu? They can always take note of the success of their derivatives and engineer their systems in much the same way.
This is the main reason why I think Ubuntu’s move to Unity and Wayland is so risky. Not because it’s a “bad idea”, but because Ubuntu still has a lot to do in the way of usability and integration work on the desktop.
And when Ubuntu’s transition to Unity is complete, it will be up to distros like Linux Mint to offer refuge to the hordes of users dissatisfied with the change.
Linux’s place on the desktop is not a war between Windows and Mac OS X it’s a battle to get its own house in order.
With a compelling offering on the table, OEMs and end-users alike will take up free software with unprecedented fervour.
In this White Paper, IDC offers up some quantifiable benefits that Asian enterprises have observed as a result of deploying backup and recovery solutions. · Many enterprises are finding that the backup and recovery processes and technologies that they have implemented have not kept pace with the demands of the business · IDC identifies how organizations can experience savings and improvements from the deployment of different types of technologies · The benefits fall into three categories: storage environment cost savings; end-user productivity enhancements; and IT staff productivity optimization
- CCTech Support | IT Services Firm - Ad hoc Projects - Echuca AreaVIC
- FTStudio Design ManagerVIC
- FTSearch/SEO/SEM/PPC - Multiple OpportunitiesNSW
- FTAcquisition Marketing ExceutiveNSW
- FTProgram Manager - Integration & SolutionsNSW
- CCTech Support | IT Services Firm - Ad hoc Projects - Port Augusta / Whyalla AreaSA
- FTSearch/SEO/SEM/PPC - Multiple OpportunitiesVIC
This helpful infographic on mobile enterprise management (MEM) details the driving forces behind this new trend, as well important considerations regarding impact on cost, productivity and security. • Increasingly, the devices used for businesses are no longer company-owned, meaning an increase in necessary IT support • Companies are most interested in device management to alleviate security and compliance concerns • BYOD models benefit companies and end users with cost savings, choice, and to demonstrate progressiveness from IT staff
- Obama signs legislation allowing regulatory e-labels for smartphones, wearables
- Data retention inquiry to report in early 2015
- Aus government begins review of cyber security strategy
- Communications coalition urges national focus on broadband adoption
- Melbourne IT eyes social media market with Tiger Pistol
- Building a non-distributed big data computing solution on Amazon Web Services
- Pressure mounts in Europe for strict net neutrality
- Use Uber? Snapchat? Google Maps? Now Twitter knows
- Opera pitches all-you-can-eat app stores to mobile operators
- Apple-IBM products in November? Not quite
- Amazon's Fire sale: Phone is now just $199 unlocked
- PoS malware also targeting ticket vending machines and electronic kiosks
- Oracle, Oregon tussle over whether federal court should hear Cover Oregon case
- First robot, networked tablets head to West Africa to fight Ebola
- HP's former CEO Carly Fiorina explores GOP presidential run