Is Network Co. the way to go?
Probably the most interesting thing to come out of Malcolm Turnbull’s speech at the National Press Club yesterday was the idea that the coalition, given the opportunity, would separate Telstra and transfer the wholesale assets to a new “Network Co”. At TechWorld we posed a similar idea, but we can’t help but ask, is it workable?
First let’s consider how such an idea could come about to begin with.
If telecommunications was ever going to be meaningful in the country then it would most certainly have to involve the absolution of any potential conflict between the network operator and service retails for most of the last-mile residential network.
As it happened, the Australian taxpayer built up a national telecommunications provider in Telstra (then also known as Telecom) which provided retail fixed line and mobile telecommunications services while maintaining control of the majority of the backhaul infrastructure.
When deregulation went ahead in the nineties Telstra wasn’t structurally separated and the only real difference made was competitive players could offer fixed line services off Telstra’s network. So the level of competition was only ever going to be as good as Telstra would allow it.
Fast forward to today and the federal government is full steam ahead building a national communications monopoly to rival Telstra in the form of NBN Co. So at a fundamental level there is little difference between an independent Telstra Wholesale and the new NBN.
Is there a half-way house? Well, yes, there is. The mandated structural separation of Telstra and another government-owned wholesaler created out of the ruins is that half-way house.
Turnbull calls it “Network Co”, but at TechWorld we dubbed it ATIC – Australian Telecommunications Infrastructure Corporation – more than two years ago.
Consider it this way:
- Telstra’s wholesale assets get transferred to “Network Co.” or “ATIC”.
- The new wholesale-only provider’s network progressively gets upgraded to FttP
- The existing management systems of Telstra wholesale are leveraged
- The bureaucratic overhead of a new NBN Co is eliminated in favour of a re-branded “Network Co” or “ATIC”
So on paper it looks reasonable enough. The big question is whether it could ever work in practice. Could Telstra ever be separated to an extent which rivals the independence of the new NBN Co? Given that Telstra’s copper network is scheduled to be replaced by NBN Co’s fibre then the answer to that question looks like being an inevitable yes.
Telstra will eventually have to come to terms with its wholesale monopoly position being eroded.
However, as Turnbull said, Telstra is encumbered by its wholesale infrastructure legacy right now. I’m just not convinced the modern – and quite diverse – Telstra retail service provider won’t be able to compete with alternative providers without owning all the network. Just this week news surfaced that Vodafone is losing thousands of customers – perhaps mostly to Telstra – to rival mobile service providers.
If Telstra was treated “like another customer” for wholesale access, do you really think its marketing machine and customer service operations would be put at an inherent disadvantage?
We’ll have to await the outcome of the next federal election to see whether “Network Co” becomes a reality. Until then, lovers of very fast broadband will yearn for the day NBN Co fibre passes their front door. They have until November 30, 2013 at the latest until the guarantee gets jeopardised.
Follow Rodney Gedda on Twitter: @rodneygedda
Follow TechWorld Australia on Twitter: @Techworld_AU
Research shows that 94% of CIOs believe that enterprise mobility has become an important part of their enterprise IT strategy. While there are many benefits for business, there are still risks when it comes to security. This whitepaper looks at the steps all organisations to take when it comes to supporting a mobile workforce.
- FTLevel 2 IT Support TechnicianVIC
- FTSystems Administrator | National commercial law firm | MS, AWS & eDiscoveryNSW
- FTField EngineerNSW
- CCMilitary simulation programmer with C# and Unity - 3 monthsNSW
- FTAndroid DeveloperNSW
- CCE-Commerce - Senior Web Application DeveloperNSW
- FTManual Test Engineer | Financial Institution | Web testingNSW
- FTSenior Consultant | Project work | National Systems IntegratorVIC
- FTLinux Administrator with AWS & DevopsNSW
- FTSystems Administrator - Managed ServicesNSW
- FT1st & 2nd level IT support all-rounder in beautiful rural BathurstNSW
- CCE-Commerce - Senior Web Application DeveloperNSW
- FTMid level IT consultant | Systems Integration & Managed ServicesNSW
More than one-third of all cyber crime incidents and security breaches are caused by insiders. This whitepaper looks at how to develop a proactive insider threat mitigation program that combines three key elements: executive leadership and advocacy, clear policy and guidance, and workforce education and training. With these elements in place, your organisation can address insider threats before they become messy and costly public problems.
- Apple's new strategy for fighting off Android, retaining customers
- Atlassian takes JIRA beyond the development world
- Arista adds security to cloud software
- Windows 10 users back away from the Edge
- Doom or delight? Court ruling on Safe Harbor brings uncertainty to privacy dealings
- EU-US Safe Harbor agreement is invalid, court rules
- Panasonic shows world's first Ultra HD Blu-ray player
- Sharp's Robohon is both a cute robot and a smartphone
- 16Lab shrinks wearable computing ring, will sell dev kit soon
- Global civil rights groups coalition wants changes to Facebook's real-name policy
- Why the software world needs a 'no-fly zone' for patents
- IP camera makers pressure researcher to cancel security talk
- Google patches second round of Stagefright flaws in Android
- Microsoft improves sharing in OneNote Class Notebooks as school year plows on
- IBM zeroes in on unstructured data with Cleversafe buy