Telstra retail service provider won’t be able to compete with alternative providers without owning all the network. http://www.kamagrafx.com/
Is Network Co. the way to go?
Probably the most interesting thing to come out of Malcolm Turnbull’s speech at the National Press Club yesterday was the idea that the coalition, given the opportunity, would separate Telstra and transfer the wholesale assets to a new “Network Co”. At TechWorld we posed a similar idea, but we can’t help but ask, is it workable?
First let’s consider how such an idea could come about to begin with.
If telecommunications was ever going to be meaningful in the country then it would most certainly have to involve the absolution of any potential conflict between the network operator and service retails for most of the last-mile residential network.
As it happened, the Australian taxpayer built up a national telecommunications provider in Telstra (then also known as Telecom) which provided retail fixed line and mobile telecommunications services while maintaining control of the majority of the backhaul infrastructure.
When deregulation went ahead in the nineties Telstra wasn’t structurally separated and the only real difference made was competitive players could offer fixed line services off Telstra’s network. So the level of competition was only ever going to be as good as Telstra would allow it.
Fast forward to today and the federal government is full steam ahead building a national communications monopoly to rival Telstra in the form of NBN Co. So at a fundamental level there is little difference between an independent Telstra Wholesale and the new NBN.
Is there a half-way house? Well, yes, there is. The mandated structural separation of Telstra and another government-owned wholesaler created out of the ruins is that half-way house.
Turnbull calls it “Network Co”, but at TechWorld we dubbed it ATIC – Australian Telecommunications Infrastructure Corporation – more than two years ago.
Consider it this way:
- Telstra’s wholesale assets get transferred to “Network Co.” or “ATIC”.
- The new wholesale-only provider’s network progressively gets upgraded to FttP
- The existing management systems of Telstra wholesale are leveraged
- The bureaucratic overhead of a new NBN Co is eliminated in favour of a re-branded “Network Co” or “ATIC”
So on paper it looks reasonable enough. The big question is whether it could ever work in practice. Could Telstra ever be separated to an extent which rivals the independence of the new NBN Co? Given that Telstra’s copper network is scheduled to be replaced by NBN Co’s fibre then the answer to that question looks like being an inevitable yes.
Telstra will eventually have to come to terms with its wholesale monopoly position being eroded.
However, as Turnbull said, Telstra is encumbered by its wholesale infrastructure legacy right now. I’m just not convinced the modern – and quite diverse – Telstra retail service provider won’t be able to compete with alternative providers without owning all the network. Just this week news surfaced that Vodafone is losing thousands of customers – perhaps mostly to Telstra – to rival mobile service providers.
If Telstra was treated “like another customer” for wholesale access, do you really think its marketing machine and customer service operations would be put at an inherent disadvantage?
We’ll have to await the outcome of the next federal election to see whether “Network Co” becomes a reality. Until then, lovers of very fast broadband will yearn for the day NBN Co fibre passes their front door. They have until November 30, 2013 at the latest until the guarantee gets jeopardised.
Follow Rodney Gedda on Twitter: @rodneygedda
Follow TechWorld Australia on Twitter: @Techworld_AU
You can always learn something new everyday. Impressive
Nose infections are attributable to infections from the pathogenic microorganism (virus, bacterium, or maybe fungus), which increases in a sinus in addition to brings about irregular blockage with the sinus ostium.
Benefits based on Forrester Consulting Study “The Total Economic Impact of Converging SAP Landscapes on Vblock™ Systems”
Face it. Modern workers are addicted to mobile devices. Not just any vanilla corporate-issued devices, but our carefully selected and personalized expressions of ourselves: iPads®, iPhones®, Androids™ and whatever-comes-next. Many of us get to use our devices in the office. According to Gartner, “IT leaders have a positive view of BYOD”1, implying that this is now a mainstream model. In supporting employee devices, companies tend to exert either very little control, or a stifling amount of control. The approach taken depends on which community has the upper hand: the employees or IT.
- Why Google wants to replace Gmail
- Wi-Fi Passpoint standard now knits together SF, San Jose, London
- Big Data Digest: Rise of the think-bots
- FCC pushes TV spectrum auction to 2016 after legal challenge
- Apple mum as Mac owners tussle with Yosemite over Wi-Fi problems
- Wireless price war's good for consumers, but challenges carriers
- Apple Pay tops Tim Cook's to-do list in China
- The ratings: Most net neutrality groups get poor grades for funding transparency
- Advocacy groups accused of obscuring corporate ties in net neutrality debate
- Secretive funding fuels ongoing net neutrality astroturfing controversy
- OS X Yosemite uptake climbs to 13% in first week
- Researcher works to make 3D-printed metals stronger, customizable
- Court shuts down alleged PC tech support scam
- New material could lead to longer-lasting batteries
- RiteAid blocks Apple Pay, Google Wallet