Telstra retail service provider won’t be able to compete with alternative providers without owning all the network. http://www.kamagrafx.com/
Is Network Co. the way to go?
Probably the most interesting thing to come out of Malcolm Turnbull’s speech at the National Press Club yesterday was the idea that the coalition, given the opportunity, would separate Telstra and transfer the wholesale assets to a new “Network Co”. At TechWorld we posed a similar idea, but we can’t help but ask, is it workable?
First let’s consider how such an idea could come about to begin with.
If telecommunications was ever going to be meaningful in the country then it would most certainly have to involve the absolution of any potential conflict between the network operator and service retails for most of the last-mile residential network.
As it happened, the Australian taxpayer built up a national telecommunications provider in Telstra (then also known as Telecom) which provided retail fixed line and mobile telecommunications services while maintaining control of the majority of the backhaul infrastructure.
When deregulation went ahead in the nineties Telstra wasn’t structurally separated and the only real difference made was competitive players could offer fixed line services off Telstra’s network. So the level of competition was only ever going to be as good as Telstra would allow it.
Fast forward to today and the federal government is full steam ahead building a national communications monopoly to rival Telstra in the form of NBN Co. So at a fundamental level there is little difference between an independent Telstra Wholesale and the new NBN.
Is there a half-way house? Well, yes, there is. The mandated structural separation of Telstra and another government-owned wholesaler created out of the ruins is that half-way house.
Turnbull calls it “Network Co”, but at TechWorld we dubbed it ATIC – Australian Telecommunications Infrastructure Corporation – more than two years ago.
Consider it this way:
- Telstra’s wholesale assets get transferred to “Network Co.” or “ATIC”.
- The new wholesale-only provider’s network progressively gets upgraded to FttP
- The existing management systems of Telstra wholesale are leveraged
- The bureaucratic overhead of a new NBN Co is eliminated in favour of a re-branded “Network Co” or “ATIC”
So on paper it looks reasonable enough. The big question is whether it could ever work in practice. Could Telstra ever be separated to an extent which rivals the independence of the new NBN Co? Given that Telstra’s copper network is scheduled to be replaced by NBN Co’s fibre then the answer to that question looks like being an inevitable yes.
Telstra will eventually have to come to terms with its wholesale monopoly position being eroded.
However, as Turnbull said, Telstra is encumbered by its wholesale infrastructure legacy right now. I’m just not convinced the modern – and quite diverse – Telstra retail service provider won’t be able to compete with alternative providers without owning all the network. Just this week news surfaced that Vodafone is losing thousands of customers – perhaps mostly to Telstra – to rival mobile service providers.
If Telstra was treated “like another customer” for wholesale access, do you really think its marketing machine and customer service operations would be put at an inherent disadvantage?
We’ll have to await the outcome of the next federal election to see whether “Network Co” becomes a reality. Until then, lovers of very fast broadband will yearn for the day NBN Co fibre passes their front door. They have until November 30, 2013 at the latest until the guarantee gets jeopardised.
Follow Rodney Gedda on Twitter: @rodneygedda
Follow TechWorld Australia on Twitter: @Techworld_AU
You can always learn something new everyday. Impressive
Nose infections are attributable to infections from the pathogenic microorganism (virus, bacterium, or maybe fungus), which increases in a sinus in addition to brings about irregular blockage with the sinus ostium.
This whitepaper is the second in a three-part series on distributed denial of service attacks (DDoS) and multi-tier DDoS protection. This section details the design and capabilities of different forms of protection architecture designed for a variety of circumstances, while also providing alternative approaches. The paper also explains how to maintain availability, including network and application defense and DNS DDoS Mitigation.
- FTMicrosoft Business Intelligence DeveloperNSW
- FTExecutive Producer/Head of Production: Advertising AgencyNSW
- FTIT Support EngineerNSW
- FTMicrosoft Business Intelligence ConsultantNSW
- FTOBIEE BI/DW ConsultantNSW
- FTBrand Relationship Manager | RTB Trading Desk | Digital Advertising | SydneyNSW
- FTCampaign Managers | RTB | Display + Video | Trading desk |SydneyNSW
- FTDeliverability SpecialistNSW
Simply being compliant is not enough to mitigate attacks and protect critical information. Organizations can reduce chances of compromise by shifting away from a compliance-driven approach. This guide provides the Top 20 Critical Security Controls (CSCs) developed by the SANS Institute to address the need for a risk-based approach to security.
- Mt. Gox has filed for liquidation in Japan, says report
- Microsoft's Chinese partner confident Xbox can compete against Android consoles
- Australia needs effective government cyber policy leadership: report
- Court slaps TPG with $400k fine over 000 failure
- Lycamobile issued warning for over-charging customers
- TPG should pay rural levy for each FTTB service: NBN Co
- Ukraine tensions could hurt international security efforts, Kaspersky says
- See ya, Microsoft: Intel looks to Android for growth in tablets
- Rushed Heartbleed fixes may expose users to new attacks
- NBN Co hits 105Mbps in limited FTTN trial
- Typo halts sales of iPhone keyboard as injunction takes effect
- In Pictures: Windows 8.1 tablets with 8-inch screens: Which one is right for you?
- Heartbleed bug is irritating McAfee, Symantec, Kaspersky Lab
- Big data drives 47% growth for top 50 public cloud companies
- Cellular industry makes concession on kill switch